Midbar
← Back
Diaspora

"Brushed Aside": When America's Psychologists Stop Listening to Their Jewish Members

According to a report cited by The Times of Israel, the American Psychological Association dismissed antisemitism complaints filed within its own ranks. Details are still scarce. But a profession built on listening that cannot hear Jewish pain raises a question that reaches far beyond America.

The headline fits on a single line, and it stings all on its own: according to a report cited by The Times of Israel, the American Psychological Association "brushed aside" antisemitism complaints filed within its ranks. As of this writing, that headline is all we have. We do not know how many complaints there were, what they alleged, who authored the report, or how the association has responded. Midbar is therefore sticking to what is established, and waiting for the rest.

What we can say without inventing anything is what such conduct would mean coming from such an institution. Psychology is, by definition, the profession of listening. Its first professional act is to take seriously the person who says they are in pain, before even judging whether that pain is justified. If an organization of psychologists receives antisemitism complaints and sets them aside without examining them, it does not merely fail its Jewish members: it contradicts itself. You cannot teach listening and then cover your ears the moment the person speaking is Jewish.

Jews have come to know this reflex well since October 7. In many institutions, in America as in Europe, Jewish pain has become the only kind that gets debated before it gets acknowledged. The Jew who says he has been hurt is asked whether he isn't exaggerating, whether he isn't confusing criticism of Israel with hatred of Jews, whether he isn't exploiting his history. No other minority is made to pass such an entrance exam for the right to hurt. A report documenting that treatment inside an association of psychologists does not describe an isolated case: it puts a name on a mechanism.

And yet there is something in this news that lifts us up. First, Jewish members filed complaints. They did not leave the room in silence; they used the channels provided and left a paper trail. Second, someone judged it necessary to write a report, and a news outlet carried it all the way to us. An institution that brushes aside complaints can be caught, provided the complainants exist and speak. That is exactly what happened here.

The lesson applies to all of us, far beyond American psychology. The Jewish civil servant in Sarcelles, the student on campus, the doctor before her professional board, the reservist at his company: each of them sometimes feels that their complaint will be "brushed aside." The answer is not to stay silent, nor to settle for being outraged among ourselves. It is to file, to document, to count, and then to stand behind those who did, religious or secular, in Israel or in the diaspora. All Jews are responsible for one another: that applies to complaint files too.

All Jews are responsible for one another: that applies to complaint files too.

It is not up to Jews to prove their pain. It is up to institutions, starting with those whose very job is to listen, to learn to hear it. We will follow this report, and the association's response, with the same standard we demand of everyone else: facts first.

#Midbar#Antisemitism#JewishNews#Israel#APA#JewishAmerica#MentalHealth#Psychology#TimesOfIsrael

Midbar lives on its readers.

No paywall, no account, no tracker. Your support, once or every month, funds what you just read.

Support Midbar

Read next